--- title: "Zimbabwe: A trade mark judgment" description: "IP judgments in Zimbabwe are rare. So the recent Supreme Court decision of Cairns Foods Limited vs Netrade Marketing (Pvt) Ltd is worth discussing." image: https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Zimbabwe.jpg canonical: https://spoor.com/ja/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/ url: https://spoor.getmd.ai/ja/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/.md last_converted: 2026-07-28T00:38:54.351Z --- ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Article", "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#article", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/" }, "author": { "name": "Spoor & Fisher", "@id": "https://spoor.com/#/schema/person/7dad7b9bcdd00617832fbe66d90d9c29" }, "headline": "Zimbabwe: A trade mark judgment", "datePublished": "2022-06-07T14:00:47+00:00", "dateModified": "2022-09-27T12:48:42+00:00", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/" }, "wordCount": 321, "commentCount": 0, "publisher": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/#organization" }, "image": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#primaryimage" }, "thumbnailUrl": "https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Zimbabwe.jpg", "keywords": [ "Trade Marks" ], "articleSection": [ "News Article" ], "inLanguage": "ja", "potentialAction": [ { "@type": "CommentAction", "name": "Comment", "target": [ "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#respond" ] } ] }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/", "url": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/", "name": "Zimbabwe: A trade mark judgment - Spoor & Fisher", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/#website" }, "primaryImageOfPage": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#primaryimage" }, "image": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#primaryimage" }, "thumbnailUrl": "https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Zimbabwe.jpg", "datePublished": "2022-06-07T14:00:47+00:00", "dateModified": "2022-09-27T12:48:42+00:00", "description": "IP judgments in Zimbabwe are rare. So the recent Supreme Court decision of Cairns Foods Limited vs Netrade Marketing (Pvt) Ltd is worth discussing.", "breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#breadcrumb" }, "inLanguage": "ja", "potentialAction": [ { "@type": "ReadAction", "target": [ "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/" ] } ] }, { "@type": "ImageObject", "inLanguage": "ja", "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#primaryimage", "url": "https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Zimbabwe.jpg", "contentUrl": "https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Zimbabwe.jpg", "width": 1400, "height": 250, "caption": "Aerial few of the world famous Victoria Falls with a large rainbow over the falls. This is right at the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe in Southern Africa. The mighty Victoria Falls at Zambezi river are one of the most visited touristic places in Africa." }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://spoor.com/zimbabwe-a-trade-mark-judgment/#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://spoor.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Zimbabwe: A trade mark judgment" } ] }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://spoor.com/#website", "url": "https://spoor.com/", "name": "Spoor & Fisher", "description": "", "publisher": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/#organization" }, "potentialAction": [ { "@type": "SearchAction", "target": { "@type": "EntryPoint", "urlTemplate": "https://spoor.com/?s={search_term_string}" }, "query-input": { "@type": "PropertyValueSpecification", "valueRequired": true, "valueName": "search_term_string" } } ], "inLanguage": "ja" }, { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://spoor.com/#organization", "name": "Spoor & Fisher", "url": "https://spoor.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "inLanguage": "ja", "@id": "https://spoor.com/#/schema/logo/image/", "url": "https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/200210-SP-Logo_RGB-01-screen-scaled.jpg", "contentUrl": "https://spoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/200210-SP-Logo_RGB-01-screen-scaled.jpg", "width": 2560, "height": 813, "caption": "Spoor & Fisher" }, "image": { "@id": "https://spoor.com/#/schema/logo/image/" }, "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/spoorfisher/", "https://x.com/spoorfisher" ] }, { "@type": "Person", "@id": "https://spoor.com/#/schema/person/7dad7b9bcdd00617832fbe66d90d9c29", "name": "Spoor & Fisher", "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "inLanguage": "ja", "@id": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c4170b7e7d52e6175f9816363d8719ca0de7acdec5fead0211250412726afcf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g", "url": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c4170b7e7d52e6175f9816363d8719ca0de7acdec5fead0211250412726afcf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g", "contentUrl": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c4170b7e7d52e6175f9816363d8719ca0de7acdec5fead0211250412726afcf9?s=96&d=mm&r=g", "caption": "Spoor & Fisher" } } ] } ``` [家](https://spoor.com) › [ナレッジセンター](https://spoor.com/knowledge-centre/) › [法的な更新/](https://spoor.com/ja/knowledge-centre/legal-updates/) › ジンバブエ：商標判決 # ジンバブエ：商標判決 Spoor＆Fisher - 762022年 [商標](https://spoor.com/ja/tag/trade-marks/), ### ジンバブエでの知財判決 ジンバブエでの知財判決はまれです。したがって、最近の最高裁判所の判決は *[ケアンズ](https://cairnsfoods.co.zw/) Foods Limited v Netrade Marketing（Pvt）Ltd* 議論する価値があります。 **事実**. 両社はジャムを販売しています。 Cairn Foodsは、Sunという単語とさまざまな果物のデバイスで構成されるマークのクラス29に登録されていますが、Netradeは、RoyalSunのマークのクラス29に後で登録されています。 Netradeがさまざまな果物を特徴とする未登録のロゴとMixedFruitJamという用語を使用したとき、CairnFoodsは商標侵害と詐称通用を訴えました。実際の混乱の証拠がありました。 **最初の裁判所** マークは紛らわしいほど類似していませんでした–不可解なことに、Cairn Foodsの登録は単なるデバイスであると言われました（「」という言葉を無視しているようです。*太陽'*）。原告は上訴した。 ***控訴院*** 南アフリカの法律にガイダンスを求め、概念的な使用を考慮する必要性、概念的な消費者、マークの一般的な印象などの問題を扱う多くの事例を引用しました。当然のことながら、裁判所は、原告の標章がSunという単語を含まないという以前の裁判所の決定を却下し、それを次のように説明しました。*論理への反抗において非常に不合理であるため、上訴への干渉を引き付ける。* **アプローチ** 'を行うべきではありません*2つのマークの法廷監査..法律は、類似点と相違点を見つけるために、裁判所がマークと問題のあるマークを綿密に覗き見することを要求していません。* 正しいテスト'*回答者のマークが平均的な消費者に与える影響の評価です…欺瞞または混乱は、調査の結果ではなく、第一印象の問題です。* についてもっと読む [アフリカの商標 – 全体像。](https://spoor.com/trade-marks-in-africa-3/) **結果。** 侵害と詐称通用の両方がありました。裁判所は差止命令を認めました。ここには画期的なことは何もありませんが、アフリカのIP法学への歓迎すべき追加です！ [お問い合わせ](mailto:info@spoor.co.uk) 詳細については。